<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of EVE Voice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winterblink.com/2008/07/23/the-future-of-eve-voice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winterblink.com/2008/07/23/the-future-of-eve-voice/</link>
	<description>made from 60% post-consumer recycled electrons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:29:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://winterblink.com/2008/07/23/the-future-of-eve-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-2733</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winterblink.com/?p=274#comment-2733</guid>
		<description>Personally I think Teamspeak&#039;s better than EVE voice, provided two important conditions are met:

1) It&#039;s being hosted on a proper server and not by someone running it on a spare machine and trying to share their gaming connection.

2) The creator of the channel picks one of the higher quality codecs.

That said, I prefer Vent to either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think Teamspeak&#8217;s better than EVE voice, provided two important conditions are met:</p>
<p>1) It&#8217;s being hosted on a proper server and not by someone running it on a spare machine and trying to share their gaming connection.</p>
<p>2) The creator of the channel picks one of the higher quality codecs.</p>
<p>That said, I prefer Vent to either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arc239Angel</title>
		<link>http://winterblink.com/2008/07/23/the-future-of-eve-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Arc239Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winterblink.com/?p=274#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>I see Eve Voice as nice addition to Eve Online, yet.. Because of connection issues or whatever reasons I&#039;m unable to use it, and always sounds garbled or I come accross garbled. So in this way, I stick to Vent and Teamspeak because of there reliability and low amount of bandwith they take up. And the fact, I can have perform Teamspeak on the Laptop, and thus allows Eve play more effeciently on my Desktop. 

If CCP ever extends Eve Voice to an external client, I forsee almost 90% of Eve will go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Eve Voice as nice addition to Eve Online, yet.. Because of connection issues or whatever reasons I&#8217;m unable to use it, and always sounds garbled or I come accross garbled. So in this way, I stick to Vent and Teamspeak because of there reliability and low amount of bandwith they take up. And the fact, I can have perform Teamspeak on the Laptop, and thus allows Eve play more effeciently on my Desktop. </p>
<p>If CCP ever extends Eve Voice to an external client, I forsee almost 90% of Eve will go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winterblink</title>
		<link>http://winterblink.com/2008/07/23/the-future-of-eve-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-2618</link>
		<dc:creator>Winterblink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winterblink.com/?p=274#comment-2618</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it was pitched at one point as taking over communications seamlessly when the connection the game has drops.  So it&#039;s not a separate client per se, just holds the connection in lieu of the game client not being active.

Not sure if it can initiate connections itself, I would imagine that wouldn&#039;t be necessary in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it was pitched at one point as taking over communications seamlessly when the connection the game has drops.  So it&#8217;s not a separate client per se, just holds the connection in lieu of the game client not being active.</p>
<p>Not sure if it can initiate connections itself, I would imagine that wouldn&#8217;t be necessary in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morph</title>
		<link>http://winterblink.com/2008/07/23/the-future-of-eve-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-2615</link>
		<dc:creator>Morph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winterblink.com/?p=274#comment-2615</guid>
		<description>Indeed the Eve Voice thing is used in most MinMatar fleets. And it works quite well. Sound quality is good too (though some ppl have some extremely crappy mics). What would be a good addition in the software though is a limiter, so that one person with a bad setup doesn&#039;t deafen the entire fleet O_o.

Anyway, an external client would be nice, but it would have to communicate with the eve-client somehow, otherwise it would just be another teamspeak etc thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed the Eve Voice thing is used in most MinMatar fleets. And it works quite well. Sound quality is good too (though some ppl have some extremely crappy mics). What would be a good addition in the software though is a limiter, so that one person with a bad setup doesn&#8217;t deafen the entire fleet O_o.</p>
<p>Anyway, an external client would be nice, but it would have to communicate with the eve-client somehow, otherwise it would just be another teamspeak etc thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

